Tag Archives: justice

Elena Kagan: What They’re Saying

Posted by: Audiegrl
Written by Jessie Lee

Here’s a run-down of the reaction so far to the President’s nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court.

News Coverage

ABC News: Kagan “Is Considered One of the Finest Legal Scholars in the Country. “Kagan, 50, is considered one of the finest legal scholars in the country, dazzling both fellow liberal and conservative friends with her intellectual and analytical prowess but also her ability to find consensus among ideological opposites.” [ABCNews.com, 5/10/10]

Fox News Channel’s Shannon Bream: Kagan Will Garner Bipartisan Support in the Senate “Because She’s Had a Very Distinguished Career. No One Would Argue Anything But That She is a Brilliant Individual – She’s Got a Fantastic Resume. And She Is Known as Being a Consensus-Builder.” Fox News Channel’s Shannon Bream: “So I would think that this is the kind of nominee that will have [Sen. Reid’s] full backing, his full support, and that of many, many other top Democrats and even some Republicans in the Senate, because she’s had a very distinguished career. No one would argue anything but that she is a brilliant individual – she’s got a fantastic resume. And she is known as being a consensus-builder, I mean, something that’s been discussed with her before. When she was a dean at Harvard she brought together a lot of people, students and faculty, and was really seen as somebody who was a bridge builder.” [Fox News Channel via Media Matters, 5/9/10]

Associated Press: “In Nominating Kagan to Replace Justice John Paul Stevens, President Barack Obama Has Chosen and Brilliant Legal Scholar.” “In nominating Kagan to replace Justice John Paul Stevens, President Barack Obama has chosen a brilliant legal scholar with liberal views and conservative friends. Kagan, 50, already has won Senate confirmation once, after Obama nominated her to be solicitor general, the administration’s top Supreme Court lawyer.” [Associated Press, 5/10/10]

CBS News’ Jan Crawford: “The Justices Really Like Her. You Should See Justice Scalia, a Conservative, and Kagan Going Back and Forth. So the White House Sees That as a Real Plus. And They Expect Her to Be a Very Effective Jurist on That Court.” “I’ve known her for a long time, she was a professor of mine at the University of Chicago Law School and she’s very engaging, quite dynamic in her personality. And you see that when she’s arguing cases before the Supreme Court. The justices really like her. You should see Justice Scalia, a conservative, and Kagan going back and forth. So the White House sees that as a real plus. And they expect her to be a very effective jurist on that court.” “CBS Early Show,” 5/10/10]

Associated Press: Kagan “Has Enjoyed a Blazing Legal Career.” “Kagan is known as sharp and politically savvy and has enjoyed a blazing legal career. She was the first female dean of Harvard Law School, first woman to serve as the top Supreme Court lawyer for any administration, and now first in Obama’s mind to succeed legendary liberal Justice John Paul Stevens.” [Associated Press, 5/10/10]

USA Today: Kagan Is “A Highly Credentialed Lawyer,” “Had a Reputation for Bringing Together Ideological Factions.” “In choosing Kagan, Obama has turned to a highly credentialed lawyer who has spent her career in the corridors of legal power, including the past year as the government’s advocate before the justices. As former dean of Harvard Law School, Kagan had a reputation for bringing together ideological factions. That style might help her bridge differences on the divided court. If confirmed, she will be the third woman on the current bench — and the fourth woman in the court’s 221-year history.” [USA Today, 5/10/10]

Senators

Sen. Patrick Leahy: Kagan “Broke the Glass Ceiling” As First Woman to Serve as Solicitor General and Dean of Harvard Law School; “Her Historic Accomplishments and the Way She Has Conducted Herself in These Positions Has Earned Her a Place at the Top of the Legal Profession” and Her Nomination “Will Bring to the Supreme Court a Diversity of Experience Missing Since Justice O’Connor Retired.” “With this nomination, Elena Kagan follows in the footsteps of her mentor, Thurgood Marshall, who also was nominated to the Supreme Court from the position of Solicitor General.  Ms. Kagan broke the glass ceiling when she was appointed as the first woman to serve as Solicitor General and also previously when she became the first woman to serve as dean of Harvard Law School.  Her historic accomplishments and the way she has conducted herself in these positions has earned her a place at the top of the legal profession. Elena Kagan’s nomination will bring to the Supreme Court a diversity of experience missing since Justice O’Connor retired in 2006.  I have urged President Obama to look outside the judicial monastery to identify qualified nominees who will bring a diversity of life experience to the Court.  Elena Kagan is just such a nominee.” [Statement by Sen. Patrick Leahy, 5/10/10]

Sen. Harry Reid: Kagan “A Worthy Nominee to Replace Justice Stevens” Who “Will Demonstrate Her Primary Allegiance Is to Fairness, Justice and the Rule of Law, Not Ideology.” “President Obama has chosen a worthy nominee to replace Justice Stevens, a jurist who Americans have respected and admired for so many years. I am particularly pleased President Obama has chosen a nominee from outside the judicial monastery. I believe that through her confirmation process, Elena Kagan will demonstrate that her primary allegiance is to fairness, justice and the rule of law, not ideology.  When Solicitor General Kagan is confirmed, the Supreme Court will have three sitting female Justices for the first time – a historic occurrence that is long overdue. Nevadans and all Americans want us to confirm a nominee who is not only immensely qualified, but also has an understanding of the real world impact the Court’s rulings will have on the American people. They want a nominee who will stand up for average Americans and ensure they get a fair hearing even against the largest and wealthiest corporations. I am confident that once confirmed, Elena Kagan will work to ensure equal justice for all Americans.” [Statement by Sen. Harry Reid, 5/10/10]

Sen. Charles Schumer: “Elena Kagan Is the Kind of Moderate, Experience Legal Leader Who Can and Should Receive Bipartisan Support in the Senate. The Fact That She Has So Much Practical Experience, on a Court Where It Is Missing, Should Be Considered an Asset.” “Elena Kagan is the kind of moderate, experienced legal leader who can and should receive bipartisan support in the Senate. The fact that she has so much practical experience, on a Court where it is missing, should be considered an asset. She has a long record as a consensus builder, and is the kind of person who can bridge the 5-4 splits that have become so routine on this Court. There is no reason why her confirmation should not be completed before the August recess.” [New York Daily News, 5/10/10]

Sen. Dick Durbin: Kagan “Is a Remarkable Lawyer” Who “Has Also Blazed a Trail for Women in America.” “I applaud President Obama’s decision to nominate Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. Ms. Kagan is a remarkable lawyer who has worked in private practice, clerked for Illinois’ own Judge Abner Mikva and Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, served as a Senate staff member and worked in the Executive Branch.  She has also blazed a trail for women in America -­ not only as the first woman to serve as Dean of the Harvard Law School but also as the first woman to serve as our nation’s Solicitor General. President Obama said he wanted someone on the high court who understood the impact of the law on average Americans, and I believe the depth and breadth of Ms. Kagan’s will allow her that perspective.” [Statement by Sen. Dick Durbin, 5/10/10]

Sen. John Kerry: “Elena Kagan Has Been an Extraordinary Trailblazer and She Will Be an Extraordinary Supreme Court Justice.” “Elena Kagan has been an extraordinary trailblazer and she will be an extraordinary Supreme Court Justice for a very long time. She brings together a remarkable combination of qualities that the Court needs today: a capable mind, a fresh energy, a proven ability to build consensus across ideological lines, and a real-world understanding of how the law and public policy impacts Americans in their daily lives,’ said Sen. Kerry.  ‘The first woman to head Harvard Law School and the first woman to serve as Solicitor General, when she is confirmed by the Senate, for the first time the Supreme Court will look a little more like America with three women serving together on the bench. Massachusetts has been Elena’s adopted home, and a place where she earned the respect of jurists and scholars from across the ideological spectrum.” [Statement by Sen. John Kerry, 5/10/10]

Sen. Amy Klobuchar: Kagan is “Very Well Respected, Extremely Intelligent,” Has “That Kind of Independent Thinking and Consensus-Building Will Serve Her Well on the Court If She Is Confirmed…She Has the Reputation of Being Fair and Open-Minded, She’s Also a Tough and Smart Woman, and I Think She Is a Good Choice for a Nominee.” Sen. Amy Klobuchar: “She’s very well respected, extremely intelligent, and I got a lot of positive words when we had our committee hearing over her confirmation from a number of the Republican senators and ultimately, as you know, got a number of Republicans voting for her on the floor, and I think part of it is the reputation she developed when she was dean of Harvard Law School, the first woman dean. She was someone that was fair, brought three conservative law professors, including Professor Goldsmith, they were all very controversial at the time but she felt it was important to bring different points of view to Harvard Law School and that kind of independent thinking and consensus-building will serve her well on the court if she is confirmed…So she has the reputation of being fair and open-minded, she’s also a tough and smart woman, and I think she is a good choice for a nominee.” [Fox News Channel, 5/10/10]

Sen. Klobuchar: Kagan “Is Extremely Intelligent, And She Would Bring a Wide Variety of Legal Experience to the Bench…Over the Years, She Has Developed a Reputation as a Person Who Brings People Together Despite Their Ideological Differences.” “Solicitor General Kagan is extremely intelligent, and she would bring a wide variety of legal experience to the bench – she’s spent time in government, in private practice, as a professor, and as the first woman dean of her law school.  Over the years, she has developed a reputation as a person who brings people together despite their ideological differences. She has shown herself to be a true leader. Like former Chief Justice Rehnquist, she comes to the court with experiences different than those of a judge.  I think it is healthy for the Court to have at least one Justice from outside of what has been termed the ‘judicial monastery.’” [Statement by Sen. Amy Klobuchar, 5/10/10]

Sen. Benjamin Cardin: As Solicitor General, Kagan “Would Bring a Unique, Firsthand Perspective to the Court, Along With a Lifetime of Broad Legal Experience.” “I welcome President Obama’s announcement today that he intends to nominate Solicitor General Elena Kagan to fill the upcoming vacancy on the Supreme Court. As Solicitor General, a position often called the tenth justice, she would bring a unique, firsthand perspective to the court, along with a lifetime of broad legal experience.” [Statement by Sen. Benjamin Cardin, 5/10/10]

Sen. Dianne Feinstein: Kagan Has A “Strong Track Record As One Of The Nation’s Top Legal Scholars, And As A Leader With A Special Skill For Bringing People Together.” “Solicitor General Elena Kagan has a strong track record as one of the nation’s top legal scholars, and as a leader with a special skill for bringing people together.  I look forward to learning more about her judicial philosophy through the Senate Judiciary Committee’s open hearing process, which I believe is an important opportunity for the public to hear directly from the nominee and shape their own views about her judicial expertise and temperament.”  [Statement by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, 5/10/10]

Legal Community & Experts

Prof. Jack Goldsmith, Head of the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel Under Pres. George W. Bush: “Elena Kagan Will Make an Outstanding Supreme Court Justice.” “Elena Kagan will make an outstanding Supreme Court justice. Kagan has had an extraordinary legal career. After graduating magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, she clerked for Thurgood Marshall at the Supreme Court; practiced law at the superb Williams & Connolly firm; did legal and policy work in the White House; taught administrative law, labor law, and civil procedure, and was a First Amendment expert, at Chicago and Harvard law schools; was Harvard’s dean; and served as Solicitor General. Kagan excelled in all of these roles and has emerged from them deeply knowledgeable about the issues that come before the Supreme Court. Kagan also has the intellectual and temperamental qualities to make a great justice. She is very smart. She is a careful lawyer. She sees legal problems in the round and thinks about them clearly and honestly. And as her transformative deanship illustrates, she has an amazing capacity to bridge disagreement. She does this by listening to all sides, engaging colleagues frankly and empathetically, patiently seeking consensus and exercising judgment openly and with good reasons. These qualities will serve the nation well on a court that adjudicates our most contentious and divisive legal issues.” [WashingtonPost.com, 5/10/01]

Brad Berenson, Associate Counsel to Pres. George W. Bush: “Elena is Universally Well-Liked and Trusted by Lawyers on Both the Right and Left of the Political Spectrum. Her Congeniality, Flexibility and Moderate Demeanor Would Serve Her Well on the Supreme Court, Where She Would Have Uncommon Potential to Build Coalitions and Consensus With Her Judicial Colleagues.” “‘Elena is universally well-liked and trusted by lawyers on both the right and left of the political spectrum,’ said Bradford Bereson, former associate counsel in the George W. Bush White House. ‘Her congeniality, flexibility, and moderate demeanor would serve her well on the Supreme Court, where she would have uncommon potential to build coalitions and consensus with her judicial colleagues, at least over time. She could turn out to be a genuinely influential justice.’” [ABCNews.com, 5/9/10]

Walter Dellinger, Assistant Attorney General and Head of the Office of Legal Counsel Under Pres. Clinton: Kagan “Will Be Influential. Her Intellectual Style Is Tough But Fair…She Appreciates the Difference Between Being an Advocate and Being a Judge.” Elena Kagan is, first and foremost, a really good listener, one who can appreciate the arguments for positions with which she does not initially agree. Those who engage with Elena come away with a sense that she has worked hard to understand what they believe and why. She will be influential. Her intellectual style is tough but fair. As solicitor general, she has stood her ground in response to questions from the bench, and the same easy comfort she exhibited as an advocate will serve her well when she engages in dialogue with the justices as their newest colleague. Thoughtful conservatives are drawn to her not for her policy views but because of the qualities she brings to discourse and decision. Having been one of the most successful law school deans of the past quarter century and having presided over the solicitor general’s office, she appreciates the values of pragmatism. And having served in the White House and Congress, she understands the necessities of workable government. Although her progressive values have led her to serve in both policy and legal positions in the past two Democratic administrations, she appreciates the difference between being an advocate and being a judge.”

Prof. Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of the School of Law at the University of California at Irvine: “Kagan is Impeccably Qualified.” “Kagan is impeccably qualified.” [WashingtonPost.com, 5/10/10]

Harvard Prof. Robert H. Mnookin: Kagan “Is an Extraordinarily Gifted and Brilliant Woman Who Is a Great Lawyer and a Very Effective Leader.” “Elena is an extraordinary and gifted and brilliant woman who is a great lawyer and very effective leader. At the Harvard Law School while she was dean, she focused on two principle activities. First: improving the educational experience for the students. Harvard Law School is a big place and she did lots to make it a much more agreeable institution than it had been in the past. And second, she worked to substantially expand the faculty, and in doing so, I served with her on the appointments committee for a number of years. She had a taste that ranged from those who were quite judicially conservative to those who were liberal. She in fact was interested most of all in the quality of people’s minds and how they would operate as a teacher.” [Fox News Channel, 5/10/10]

Prof. Laurence Tribe: Kagan “Has an Excellent Chance and She Would Be Terrific. She Has a Masterful Command of So Many Areas of the Law.” “She has an excellent chance, and she would be terrific,” Harvard law professor Laurence H. Tribe said. “She has a masterful command of so many areas of law.” [Los Angeles Times, 5/10/10]

Benjamin Wittes, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution: Kagan “Warrants Confirmation in a Matter of Hours…She Is Obviously Smart, Capable and Well-Qualified, and Her Views Obviously Fall Within the Diverse Streams of Thought That Make Up the Bread and Butter of the American Approach to the Rule of Law.” “Elena Kagan, like the three sitting members of the Supreme Court whose nominations immediately preceded her, warrants confirmation in a matter of hours. Like John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and Sonia Sotomayor, she is obviously smart, capable, and well-qualified, and her views obviously fall within the diverse streams of thought that make up the bread and butter of the American approach to the rule of law. The Senate and the public know everything they need to know to vote on her confirmation today.” [WashingtonPost.com, 5/10/10]

John Podesta, Head of the Center for American Progress: Kagan “Is a First-Rate Intellect, a Passionate Legal Scholar and a Dedicated Public Servant – and She Is Both Well-Prepared and Well-Suited to Serve on the Nation’s Highest Court.” “As a friend and colleague of Elena Kagan for more than 20 years, I applaud her nomination to the Supreme Court. General Kagan is a first-rate intellect, a passionate legal scholar and a dedicated public servant—and she is both well-prepared and well-suited to serve on the nation’s highest Court. As my colleague in the White House, Elena Kagan worked tirelessly to expand opportunity for all Americans willing to work hard and play by the rules. She understands that the law imposes obligations on all Americans, and she will have no patience for well-heeled interest groups who believe that their wealth and influence should grant them immunity from the law.” [Time.com, 5/10/10]

Former Judge Abner Mikva Called Kagan “One Of The Best Clerks I Ever Had.” MIKVA: “Well, Harvard always attracts some of the best and brightest law talents in the country.  And it was hardly a year, even though I’m a Chicago man myself, that I didn’t have a Harvard clerk. She had been the executive editor of the Harvard Law Review, the number two spot, and her credentials were just incredible. She was one of the brightest kids in the class.  The professors I talked to said she’s smart, hard working. She understands what the law’s about and they were right.  She was one of the best clerks I ever had.” [MSNBC, Andrea Mitchell Reports, 5/10/10]

Mikva Said Kagan’s Non-Judicial Background Was “A Real Plus,” Citing Past Supreme Court Judges From Outside The Court And Appeals Court Judges Who Struggled With “Narrow” Viewpoints. MITCHELL: “But since 1972 someone has been nominated who was not a judge first. Do you think that is a real gap in her resume?” MIKVA: “No, I think it’s a real plus. When you look back at some of the great justices who had not been judges before…Justice Hugo Black, Arthur Goldberg…You mentioned Chief Justice Rehnquist. Justice Powell. These are people who have not been judges and they brought an important viewpoint to the United States Supreme Court that unfortunately is missing when you have nine judges.  Nine appeals court judges, which is what we’ve had up to now.  The problem with being an appeals court judge and I was one, your viewpoints tend to be   narrow. Your input tends to be narrow.  You talk to other judges and you talk to lawyers and that’s a very small piece of the body populate.” [MSNBC, Andrea Mitchell Reports, 5/10/10]

Advertisements

7 Comments

Filed under Law, Supreme Court, Uncategorized

First Lady Michelle Obama Takes Mentee’s to Visit Supreme Court Justices

Posted by: Audiegrl

First Lady Michelle Obama listens as Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor talk with a group of young women, during a mentoring event at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., March 17, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Samantha Appleton)

Looking for more stories on the First Lady? Check out our brand new section: FLOTUS: All Things Michelle Obama

Leave a comment

Filed under Courts, First Lady Michelle Obama, Justice Sonya Sotomayer, Students, Supreme Court, Uncategorized, Young Women

The Death of U.S. Political Democracy For The People

Posted by: LibbyShaw

Will the Senator from Wal-Mart please yield to the Senator from Halliburton? The Congressman from Black Water has 5 minutes remaining before the Congresswoman from United Health may speak.

Mark your calendars, folks. January 21, 2010 is the day the radical and activist Supreme Court of the United States delivered the U.S. Democracy into the hands of the corporate sector and special interests groups. According to an article in the New York Times corporations, lobbyists and unions can now legally purchase their candidates of choice.

“We have got a million we can spend advertising for you or against you – whichever one you want,’ ” a lobbyist can tell lawmakers, said Lawrence M. Noble, a lawyer at Skadden Arps in Washington and former general counsel of the Federal Election Commission.

The decision yesterday will usher in unimaginable numbers of Swift Boat attack ads. Corporate fat cats can now threaten and bully politicians to do their bidding or else.

“It will put on steroids the trend that outside groups are increasingly dominating campaigns,” Mr. Ginsberg said. “Candidates lose control of their message. Some of these guys lose control of their whole personalities.”

“Parties will sort of shrink in the relative importance of things,” he added, “and outside groups will take over more of the functions – advertising support, get out the vote – that parties do now.”

Front row: Associate Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Antonin G. Scalia, and Clarence Thomas. Back row: Associate Justices Samuel A. Alito, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor.

Some have called the SOTUS decision a power grab that is intellectually dishonest.

In opening the floodgates for corporate money in election campaigns, the Supreme Court did not simply engage in a brazen power grab. It did so in an opinion stunning in its intellectual dishonesty.

Many of those commenting on the decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission have focused on the power-grab part. I agree with them. It was unnecessary for the court to go so far when there were several less-radical grounds available. It was audacious to seize the opportunity to overrule precedents when the parties had not pressed this issue and the lower courts had not considered it. It was the height of activism to usurp the judgments of Congress and state legislatures about how best to prevent corruption of the political process.

“If it is not necessary to decide more, it is necessary not to decide more,” a wise judge once wrote. That was Chief Justice John G. Roberts — back when — and dissenting Justice John Paul Stevens rightly turned that line against him.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Republicans naturally and predictably love this recent ruling. But of course they would. Republicans embrace and fully support authoritarian forms of government. And the sad truth of the matter is the GOP has always worked for the corporate sector.

It is devastatingly unfortunate that Republican voters have never been able to understand the hard, cold and mean reality of those they elect into office. Politicians take an oath to serve the people in their districts but many merely give their constituents nothing but empty rhetoric. If one were to closely examine one’s Republican lawmakers’ voting records one would find who their elected officials really work for.

My guess is the teabaggers will wraps it head around the reality of the SCOTUS decision like we progressives have, for the only one imperative we do share in common is a collective outrage over the corporate takeover of the U.S. government and its legislative process by special interest groups and corporations.

But unfortunately teabaggers, unlike progressives, are far too easily led astray by the likes of Dick Armey, one of the numerous behind the scenes leaders of the teabagger movement. Armey’s main mission is to promote the interests of the health care industry. He and his organization, Freedom Works, uses teabaggers as its tools.

Republicans and teabaggers alike have been led to believe that the government is the root of everything evil while progressives know that government is the only force that can and will protect us from the evils of self-serving greed mongers of the corporate sector.

We are where we are today b/c the corporate sector has been enabled to run rough shod over the American people. We are broke. There are no jobs. We lost homes. We lost retirement savings. Meanwhile on Wall St. the fat cats who can now purchase politicians get richer by the minute.

Elections have consequences. The nice guy or girl candidate with whom to have a beer could very well be an anti-political democracy devil in disguise who has every intention of throwing the middle and working classes to the lions.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Oh, and Prince Alwaleed, grandson of the King of Saudi Arabia and the largest individual shareholder in Citigroup and second biggest shareholder in News Corp (Murdock’s FOX “News”) doesn’t like Obama’s tax on the banks.

Who would have thought?

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Leave a comment

Filed under 2010 Elections, 2012 Elections, 2016 Elections, Barack Obama, Congress, Countdown, Courts, Democrats, Elections, Fox News, Government, Governors, Independents, Journalism, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Sonya Sotomayer, Kieth Olbermann, Law, Lobbyist, Mayors, Media and Entertainment, MSNBC, News, Obama Administration, Opinions, Partisan Politics, Politics, Pres. Barack Obama, Presidents, Rachel Maddow, Republicans, Senate, Supreme Court, Tea Party Protestors, Technology, The Rachel Maddow Show, TV Shows, United States, Video/YouTube, Washington, DC, Women's Issues

President Obama on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s Legacy

Today, to celebrate the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Day of Service and honor Dr. King’s life and legacy, President and Mrs. Obama, and 10 Cabinet Secretaries and senior Administration officials participated in community service projects in Washington, DC. Led by the Corporation for National and Community Service and the King Center, the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service is an opportunity for all Americans to come together to help meet the needs of their communities and make an ongoing commitment to service throughout the year. This year, the King Day of Service includes thousands of projects – from delivering meals and refurbishing schools to reading to children, promoting nonviolence and more – spread across all 50 states.

President Barack Obama gets a hug from Victoria Kennedy at a campaign stop for Democratic senate candidate, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley at Northeastern University in Boston, Sunday, Jan. 17, 2010.(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

President Barack Obama gets a hug from Victoria Kennedy at a campaign stop for Democratic senate candidate, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley at Northeastern University in Boston, Sunday, Jan. 17, 2010.(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Dr. King dedicated his life to advancing social justice and equal opportunity for all,” President Obama said. “But more than forty years after his death, there is still much work left to be done. Through service, we honor his legacy by helping our neighbors, strengthening our communities and meeting the challenges we face together. I encourage all Americans to not only continue Dr. King’s work through service today, but to make service a part of your lives every day.”

The President, First Lady and their family visited So Others Might Eat, an organization dedicated to helping people get off the streets and empowering them to make lasting changes in their lives. The First Family served food to homeless and hungry men, women and children.

Later at the White House, Obama will host a conversation with a small group of African American seniors and their grandchildren on the legacy of the civil rights movement.

In the evening, the president and Mrs. Obama plan to attend the “Let Freedom Ring” concert at the Kennedy Center. The concert features nationally renowned artists and choir members from Washington area churches.

The President speaks about the life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the importance of persistence in achieving broader goals in remarks at the Vermont Avenue Baptist Church in Washington, D.C. January 17, 2010.

Vodpod videos no longer available.
President Obama speaks after an event where members of different generations reflected on the legacy of the Civil Rights Movement and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Vodpod videos no longer available.

5 Comments

Filed under African-Americans, Barack Obama, Change, Children, Civil Rights Movement, Culture, First Daughters, First Lady Michelle Obama, Holidays, MLK Day, Nobel Peace Prize, Nobel Prize, Non-Violence, Politics, Pres. Barack Obama, Presidents, United States, Video/YouTube

Senator Arlen Specter Announces Support for Stalled Justice Department Nominee Dawn Johnsen

Posted by: Audiegrl

ThinkProgress/Amanda Terkel~Last year, President Obama nominated Dawn Johnsen to head the Office of Legal Counsel, which, during the Bush administration, sanctioned torture. Johnsen, however, was an outspoken critic of the so-called “torture memos.” Conservatives blocked her nomination, and the White House has said that it plans to renominate her when the Senate officially reconvenes later this month. Even after he became a Democrat, Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter said that he opposed Johnsen’s nomination. However, today his office released a statement in which Specter says that he will now support her:

After voting ‘pass’ (which means no position) in the Judiciary Committee, I had a second extensive meeting with Ms. Johnsen and have been prepared to support her nomination when it reaches the Senate floor.

Spencer Ackerman notes that Republican Sen. Dick Lugar (IN) has also said he is standing by his support for Johnsen, meaning she has the 60 votes necessary to be confirmed.

blank
More @

Leave a comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Cabinet, Democrats, Government, Law, News, Obama Administration, Politics, Pres. Barack Obama, Presidents, Republicans, Senate

44-D’s Impact Diaries: How Will You Answer Dr. King’s Question?

Posted by: Audiegrl



The Corporation for National and Community Service shares a wonderful story of how Miami residents are coming together to green and beautify their community to honor the life and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The Miami project is just one example of how people are coming together to serve their communities as part of January 18th’s MLK Day of Service. To find service projects in your community, visit serve.gov/MLKDay.

How will you answer Dr. King’s question?

On January, 18, 2010, people of all ages and backgrounds will come together to improve lives, bridge social barriers, and to move our nation closer to the “Beloved Community” that Dr. King envisioned. Dr. Martin Luther King devoted his life’s work to causes of equality and social justice. He taught that through nonviolence and service to one another, problems such as hunger and homelessness, prejudice and discrimination can be overcome. Dr. King’s teachings can continue to guide us in addressing our nation’s most pressing needs—poverty, economic insecurity, job loss and education.

Please volunteer with Americans across the nation on the 2010 King Day of Service and make a real in difference in your community. Fueled by President Obama’s call to service, the 2009 Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service experienced a historic level of participation, as Americans across the country honored Dr. King by serving their communities on the January 19 King Holiday. In total, more than 13,000 projects took place — the largest ever in the 14 years since Congress encouraged Americans to observe the King Holiday as a national day of service and charged the Corporation for National and Community Service with leading this national effort.

Thousands volunteered to prepare care packages for troops stationed in Iraq during Serve DC's Operation Gratitude project for the 2009 Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service in Washington, DC.

How to You Can Serve

2010 MLK Day Technology Challenge

We are calling on educators and web professionals to join our new effort – the 2010 MLK Day Technology Challenge. The idea is simple: to connect schools with technology needs to IT and web professionals, developers, graphic designers and new media professionals who are willing to volunteer their skills for good, take on these technology projects and give back to a school in need. Learn more.

MLK Day Resources

Everything you need to plan a King Day project – including tips on getting started, building partnerships, organizing the day, and fundraising. You’ll also find a service-learning guide for schools and organizations, project examples, and marketing tools to help promote your project.

For more information…

Leave a comment

Filed under Art, Barack Obama, Change, Charity, Children, Civil Rights Movement, Computers, Culture, Dancing, Education, Entertainment, Green, History, Holidays, Hunger, Media and Entertainment, Military, MLK Day, Music, News, Nobel Peace Prize, Nobel Prize, Non-Violence, Philanthropy, Plays, Politics, Pres. Barack Obama, Presidents, States, Technology, Uncategorized, United States, US, Video/YouTube, Women's Issues, World

Sotomayor’s Opinion Marks the Supreme Court’s First Use of the Term ‘undocumented immigrant.’

Posted by Audiegrl

ThinkProgress.org/Amanda Terkel—Yesterday, the Supreme Court “released its first four decisions in argued cases this term,” including one marking Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s debut.

In an otherwise dry opinion, Justice Sotomayor did introduce one new and politically charged term into the Supreme Court lexicon.

Justice Sotomayor’s opinion in the case, Mohawk Industries v. Carpenter, No. 08-678, marked the first use of the term “undocumented immigrant,” according to a legal database. The term “illegal immigrant” has appeared in a dozen decisions.

blank
More @

Sotomayor Draws Retort From Fellow Justice Clarance Thomas

New York Times/Adam Liptak—The Supreme Court released its first four decisions in argued cases this term on Tuesday. They were all minor, but one was notable for being Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s Supreme Court debut and for prompting a testy concurrence from Justice Clarence Thomas.

The case concerned whether federal trial-court rulings concerning the lawyer-client privilege may be appealed right away. Justice Sotomayor, with methodical reasoning and a formal writing style, said no.

Justice Sotomayor said that result was dictated by sound policy and was consistent with a law governing appeals.

The decision was unanimous, but Justice Clarence Thomas declined to join the part of Justice Sotomayor’s opinion discussing why the cost of allowing immediate appeals outweighs the possibility that candid communications between lawyers and their clients might be chilled.

In a concurrence, Justice Thomas took a swipe at his new colleague, saying she had “with a sweep of the court’s pen” substituted “value judgments” and “what the court thinks is a good idea” for the text of a federal law.

blank
More @

If your wondering about that sound your hearing? Don’t worry, it’s just Lou Dobbs’ head exploding. 😉

Leave a comment

Filed under Courts, Culture, Hispanic/Latino/Latina, Immigration, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Sonya Sotomayer, Law, Lou Dobbs, News, Politics, Supreme Court, Uncategorized, United States