Thank You, Mr. President by ‘Morning Joe‘ Scarbourough

Posted by Audiegrl

Joe Scarborough, Host of MSNBC's Morning Joe, former member of Congress

Joe Scarborough, Host of MSNBC's Morning Joe, former member of Congress

I could not have been more surprised when I read this article. Normally, MSNBC’s Morning Joe and I don’t agree on much. With his article, Thank You, Mr. President, he and I are on exactly the same page. It was fantastic to see the President so committed to winning the 2016 Olympics for Chicago and the entire country. It was refreshing to see him go to the mat for America, just like all the other foreign Presidents do for their countries. President Obama being the first POTUS to go there personally was not a negative, but a positive sign that we will no longer be viewed as an arrogant nation who puts itself above the rest of the world. Even though we lost the bid, I was proud to see the President behave so graciously towards Brazil in defeat. Some times the best way to judge a person (or in this case a countries) character is by how they behave in defeat. Morning Joe must feel the same way, which is probably why he is chastising his fellow conservatives. They are an object lesson in how not to be a good loser. If they ever intend to win another National election, they should heed his words. Nobody wants to vote for a sore loser.

Count me as one conservative who is disappointed that President Obama’s hometown will not be hosting the 2012 Olympic Games.

Chicago is a beautiful city that would have made a perfect backdrop for the Olympics. The President was right to fly to Copenhagen to try to land the games, not for the sake of his city, but for the good of his country. The fact President Obama failed makes me respect him more for taking the chance, and the fact many right-wing figures opposed the President’s mission shows just how narrow-minded partisanship makes us all.

For the better part of 20 years, a bitterness has infected our politics that has weakened our country.

We Republicans spent eight years trying to delegitimize Bill Clinton.

Democrats spent the next eight years doing the same to George W. Bush.

Now that a Democrat is in the Oval Office again, it is the GOP who is trying to delegitimize a sitting president.

When I try to talk to Republicans about the need to break this cycle of viciousness, some cite the chapter and verse of every hateful left wing attack against George W. Bush.

Whenever I attempt to have a conversation with some Democrats about the need for us respect our president– whether he be an Obama or a Bush– I am told that Bush deserved whatever he got because he was a lying war criminal who hated the Constitution and loved torturing people.

Fortunately, there are a growing number of Americans who believe we cannot continue going on this way.

You and I may disagree on how the CIA handled terror suspects. But that does not mean that you are soft on terrorism anymore than it means that I hate the Constitution.

You and I may have a different approach to Afghanistan. But just because you want to stay there another five years doesn’t mean you are an imperialist. And if I believe a decade in that forsaken land is more than enough, that doesn’t mean I’m soft on al Qaeda or the Taliban.

It just means that we view the world differently.

That creative tension–that intense give and take–has been what has kept America strong since Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton fought like hell in George Washington’s White House.

Hamilton wanted a strong centralized government while Jefferson believed that the government that governed least governed best.

Both men were frustrated by the checks and balances that stood in the way of their agendas, but that debate shaped America for years to come.

But something has gone terribly wrong.

Today on Morning Joe, NBC News Legend Tom Brokaw remarked to Pat Buchanan about how the level of partisanship is even more intense today than during the depths of the Watergate crisis. Brokaw was commenting on Congressman Grayson’s comments, but he could have easily
been talking about Joe Wilson or death panels or the bizarre claim that the President “hates all white people.”

Some of the rhetoric is dangerous. But what we saw from some conservative corners regarding the President’s failed Olympics bid was just plain stupid.

I’m happy for Rio and think it is past time that South America got a chance to host the Olympic Games. But put me down as one conservative who is glad my president flew across the ocean to try to bring the 2016 Games to America.

Nice try, President Obama. And thanks for taking time away from your young girls for the sake of your hometown and your country, Michelle. I know that’s never an easy thing to do.~~Joe Scarbourough

More @ Huffington_Post_Logo

MSNBC’s Ed Schultz , Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), and MSNBC Contributor Jim Warren discuss why the Republican Party’s has a anti-Obama’s agenda from the Olympics to health care reform.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about "msag", posted with vodpod

Rachel Maddow is joined by Rep. Danny Davis (D-IL) to try and make some sense of conservatives celebrating the news that the International Olympic Committee decided the summer Olympic games won’t be held in Chicago in 2016.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about "tester", posted with vodpod

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, E.J. Dionne, and NYT conservative Columnist David Brooks comment on Sunday’s Meet the Press.

Joe Scarborough discusses the Republicans cheering for the failure of America getting the 2016 Olympics

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under 2016 Olympics, Culture, Democrats, Media and Entertainment, Opinions, Partisan Politics, Politics, Republicans, Television, TV Shows, Uncategorized

2 responses to “Thank You, Mr. President by ‘Morning Joe‘ Scarbourough

  1. betsmeier

    I don’t agree with Joe most of the time. But I do respect him just because he’s not one of those out there in far right field. He has respect for the office of the President and respects Obama. He doesn’t always agree with him, but he does show him respect. And if he agrees with him he tells you that he does.

    • audiegrl

      My thoughts exactly. ๐Ÿ™‚

      I think that Joe might be trying to run as a moderate Republican in 2012. Hence, his new job of being the ‘voice of reason’ in the party.

      One of the pundits explained it earlier today. Yes, the over-the-top rhetoric pleases the base. Yes, probably in the 2010 mid-term elections, the Republicans will probably pick up some seats. Mid-terms are generally voted on by older Americans, many of the demographics that would traditionally vote Democratic, don’t normally come out. But for the national elections in 2012? That’s a whole different story. So it will not really matter how much they rile up their base, the numbers don’t add up. The base is shrinking.

      Bets, I am going to put up David Brooks op-ed on this subject. You will enjoy it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s